Treadstone Associates
Ask an Expert · 5 min read

Are the outgoing directors of a company I’m buying personally liable for unpaid wages, and do incoming directors inherit that liability?

Outgoing directors can be liable, incoming ones generally are not for arrears that predate them, and how long the exposure lasts depends on which corporate statute the company was formed under.

Treadstone Associates · Updated 2026

Short answer

CBCA s.119(1) makes directors “jointly and severally, or solidarily, liable…for all debts not exceeding six months wages…for services performed for the corporation while they are such directors.” The liability attaches to a period, not to the office itself — a director appointed after the wages were earned is not liable for them, however unpaid those wages remain on the appointment date. But it is not free of consequence for outgoing directors either: s.119(3) keeps them exposed to suit for two years after they cease to be a director, and a company incorporated provincially may have no equivalent cutoff at all.

The six-month figure is a cap per employee, not a look-back window

Reading “six months wages” as a look-back period is the commonest way this provision is misapplied. It is a cap on quantum for each employee, and the liability itself runs to whichever period of directorship the services were performed in. Nothing is payable unless one of three conditions precedent in s.119(2) is also met — suit against the corporation with execution unsatisfied, or a proved claim in a winding-up, liquidation or bankruptcy — so a solvent corporation that simply pays its arrears produces no director liability at all, whoever sits on the board when it does.

Provincial incorporation can remove the two-year cutoff entirely

CBCA s.119(3) is a complete, self-contained limitation: a director is not liable “unless sued for a debt…while a director or within two years after ceasing to be a director.” Ontario’s Business Corporations Act s.131 tracks the federal wage cap and conditions precedent closely but sets no limitation period of its own. Where a specific Ontario statute is silent, the general Limitations Act, 2002 s.4 fills the gap with a two-year period running from discovery of the claim, not from a fixed corporate-law event, backstopped only by the fifteen-year ultimate limit in s.15(2) — which can leave an OBCA company’s former directors exposed well past the point a CBCA company’s directors would already have been safe.

A shareholder veto right can create director-style liability without a board seat

CBCA s.146(5) can extend liability beyond anyone actually appointed to the board. Where a unanimous shareholder agreement restricts the directors’ powers — giving a rolled-over founder, for example, approval rights over hiring or capital spending — the shareholders who hold those rights take on a director’s liabilities to the extent the agreement restricts the directors’ powers, whether or not they ever sat on the board.

Where this played out — Case Files

The OBCA/CBCA limitation contrast decided a share purchase where the outgoing directors’ wage clock never stopped running. The period-not-office point is worked through in wage arrears the new directors did not inherit. For the veto-right extension, see a veto right that came with directors’ liabilities.

Sources

Get a second opinion before it becomes a filing.

A 30-minute call is enough to tell you whether your structure holds up.

The Canadian benchmark

What do businesses like this one actually sell for?

Canadian small-business transaction data is not published anywhere, so most valuations in this country quote an American benchmark. The Deavo–Treadstone Acquisition Index is a daily record of Canadian listings built to replace that: asking-price distributions by province and city are published now, and days on market, departure rates and asking-to-sale spreads follow as the series lengthens. Leave an email and we will tell you as each measure lands.

No pitch, no listings. One email when the first report lands.