Treadstone Associates
Ask an Expert · 4 min read

Can a private party sue over a merger or business practice the Competition Bureau declined to pursue?

A buyer can inherit exposure under an agreement it never negotiated, and the person suing over it does not need the Commissioner's help to get a hearing.

Treadstone Associates · Updated 2026

Short answer

For most reviewable practices, yes, with the Tribunal's permission — but not for merger review itself. Section 103.1 of the Competition Act lets any person apply to the Competition Tribunal for leave to bring a private application under sections 74.1, 75, 76, 77, 79 or 90.1. Section 92, the merger review provision, is not on that list, so a private party cannot use s.103.1 to challenge a merger the Commissioner chose not to pursue.

Leave turns on being directly affected, or on the public interest

Section 103.1(7) sets the leave test for most of the listed sections: “The Tribunal may grant leave to make an application under section 75, 77, 79 or 90.1 if it has reason to believe that the applicant is directly and substantially affected in the whole or part of the applicant's business by any conduct referred to in one of those sections that could be subject to an order under that section or if it is satisfied that it is in the public interest to do so.” The applicant does not need the Commissioner to have investigated, or agreed with them, first.

The list is deliberately exhaustive, and it stops before s.92

Section 103.1(1) names the full route: “Any person may apply to the Tribunal for leave to make an application under section 74.1, 75, 76, 77, 79 or 90.1.” Merger review under s.92 is conspicuously absent — Parliament gave private parties a route into the civil reviewable-practices provisions but kept merger review itself as a Commissioner-only gate. Section 90.1(1)(a) is one of the sections leave can reach, and it lets an order bind “any person — whether or not a party to the agreement or arrangement — from doing anything under the agreement or arrangement,” which is how a buyer can end up defending an agreement it inherited on closing rather than negotiated.

Once leave is granted and used, the Commissioner is boxed out of the same ground

Section 103.1(10) reads: “The Commissioner may not make an application for an order under section 74.1, 75, 76, 77, 79 or 90.1 on the basis of the same or substantially the same facts as are alleged in a matter for which the Tribunal has granted leave …, if the person granted leave has already applied to the Tribunal under one of those sections.” So a private application, once it is actually filed, is not merely a parallel track running alongside whatever the Commissioner might do — it can become the only proceeding on those facts, with no help from, or interference by, the Commissioner in either direction.

Where this plays out in the Case Files

Sources

See where AI pays off first in your business.

A 30-minute call is enough to tell you whether AI pays for itself here.

The Canadian benchmark

What do businesses like this one actually sell for?

Canadian small-business transaction data is not published anywhere, so most valuations in this country quote an American benchmark. The Deavo–Treadstone Acquisition Index is a daily record of Canadian listings built to replace that: asking-price distributions by province and city are published now, and days on market, departure rates and asking-to-sale spreads follow as the series lengthens. Leave an email and we will tell you as each measure lands.

No pitch, no listings. One email when the first report lands.