Treadstone Associates
Ask an Expert · 3 min read

Can you use a section 85 rollover if the buyer is a partnership or a foreign company?

The deferral in section 85 depends on exactly who receives the property, and two structures common in a rollover deal quietly fall outside it.

Treadstone Associates · Updated 2026

Short answer

No. Section 85(1) only applies where a taxpayer disposes of eligible property “to a taxable Canadian corporation for consideration that includes shares of the capital stock of the corporation” — a partnership and a non-Canadian holding company are both outside that description, so the gain crystallizes immediately no matter how the deal was priced. A separate election exists for a genuine partnership contribution, and it has its own conditions.

The rule: the recipient has to be a taxable Canadian corporation

Section 85(1) lets a taxpayer elect a transfer price between cost and fair market value on a disposition of eligible property “to a taxable Canadian corporation for consideration that includes shares of the capital stock of the corporation”. That phrase is doing real work: it is not any corporation, it is a corporation resident and taxable in Canada. Put the property into a partnership, or into a holding company incorporated outside Canada, and the taxpayer and the transferee have nothing to jointly elect under this section — there is no rollover to fall back on, and the disposition is taxed in the ordinary way when it happens.

When it changes

Two structures reach a similar economic result through different sections, each with its own conditions. A genuine contribution of property to a Canadian partnership has a separate election under section 97(2), with its own joint-election mechanics — it does not rescue a transfer into a corporation that turns out not to be Canadian, and it is not a substitute for section 85 on a share sale into a foreign topco.

Where this played out — Case Files

In one deal, a rollover equity commitment negotiated in good faith fell apart on exactly this point because the sponsor’s top holding company was incorporated in Delaware. In another, the seller’s advisor kept reaching for section 85 to defer a gain into a newly formed limited partnership — a structure the section does not reach at all. Both are worked examples in the Treadstone Academy Case Files library.

Sources

  • • Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.), s.85(1) — laws-lois.justice.gc.ca.
  • • Income Tax Act s.97(2) — the parallel partnership-contribution election, cited for the structural contrast; not separately quoted here.
  • • Treadstone Law — how a section 85 rollover works for an Ontario corporation — general background on the rollover mechanism; it does not address the Canadian-corporation or partnership boundary, which is the specific question here.

Get a second opinion before it becomes a filing.

A 30-minute call is enough to tell you whether your structure holds up.

The Canadian benchmark

What do businesses like this one actually sell for?

Canadian small-business transaction data is not published anywhere, so most valuations in this country quote an American benchmark. The Deavo–Treadstone Acquisition Index is a daily record of Canadian listings built to replace that: asking-price distributions by province and city are published now, and days on market, departure rates and asking-to-sale spreads follow as the series lengthens. Leave an email and we will tell you as each measure lands.

No pitch, no listings. One email when the first report lands.