Treadstone Associates
Ask an Expert · 5 min read

Is buying a foreign company that owns a Canadian subsidiary reviewable under the Investment Canada Act?

Nobody in Canada has to sign anything for the Investment Canada Act to reach the deal.

Treadstone Associates · Updated 2026

Short answer

It can be, even with no Canadian signing party anywhere in the transaction. Section 14(1)(c)-(d) of the Investment Canada Act reaches an indirect acquisition of control — buying a foreign parent that itself controls a Canadian business — and which of two thresholds applies turns on whether the Canadian assets exceed 50% of the value of everything being acquired in the deal under s.14(2): if they do, the deal is tested under the ordinary limits in s.14(3); if they don't, a separate, higher $50 million threshold in s.14(4) applies instead, and a WTO-investor exemption in s.14.1(4) can remove indirect deals from review entirely.

The 50% ratio decides which threshold you're even measuring against

Section 14(2) reads: “The circumstances referred to in paragraphs (1)(c) and (d) are that the value … of the assets of the entity carrying on the Canadian business, and of all other entities in Canada, the control of which is acquired … amounts to more than fifty per cent of the value … of the assets of all entities the control of which is acquired … in the transaction of which the acquisition of control of the Canadian business forms a part.” Above that 50% line, the deal is tested under the ordinary limits in s.14(3) or the higher-tier investor thresholds in ss.14.1/14.11.

Below the 50% line, there's a separate $50 million gate

Section 14(4) sets the alternative test: an investment “is reviewable under this Part where the value … of the assets of the entity carrying on the Canadian business, and of all other entities in Canada, the control of which is acquired, directly or indirectly, is fifty million dollars or more.” A European-to-European share sale with a Canadian subsidiary buried several layers down in the corporate chain still has to be measured against this figure.

WTO investors can be exempted from indirect review altogether

Section 14.1(4) provides: “Despite paragraphs 14(1)(c) and (d), an investment described in either paragraph that is implemented after this subsection comes into force is not reviewable under section 14 if it is made by (a) a WTO investor; or (b) a non-Canadian, other than a WTO investor, if the Canadian business … is … controlled by a WTO investor.” For a WTO-investor buyer, this exemption can remove an indirect acquisition from ICA review entirely, regardless of how large the underlying Canadian subsidiary is.

Where this plays out in the Case Files

Sources

  • • Investment Canada Act s.14 — s.14(1)(c)–(d) the indirect-acquisition categories, s.14(2) the 50% asset ratio, s.14(4) the $50 million indirect threshold.
  • • Investment Canada Act s.14.1(4) — the WTO-investor exemption for indirect acquisitions.
  • • No Treadstone Law page addresses indirect-acquisition rules under the Investment Canada Act. Treadstone Law's published coverage is general Ontario business and corporate law and does not reach this federal mechanism, so none of its pages is cited here rather than force an adjacent link that does not genuinely cover the topic.

See where AI pays off first in your business.

A 30-minute call is enough to tell you whether AI pays for itself here.

The Canadian benchmark

What do businesses like this one actually sell for?

Canadian small-business transaction data is not published anywhere, so most valuations in this country quote an American benchmark. The Deavo–Treadstone Acquisition Index is a daily record of Canadian listings built to replace that: asking-price distributions by province and city are published now, and days on market, departure rates and asking-to-sale spreads follow as the series lengthens. Leave an email and we will tell you as each measure lands.

No pitch, no listings. One email when the first report lands.