Distributions to paid-in capital, or DPI, measures how much cash a fund has actually returned to its limited partners relative to how much those LPs have paid in — it is the “cash-on-cash” half of fund performance, and unlike a mark on an unrealized position, a DPI number cannot be revised down by the next quarter’s valuation.
The industry-standard definition comes from the Institutional Limited Partners Association — whose membership and reporting templates a Canadian LP is just as likely to be working from as a US one, and which keeps a Toronto office alongside Washington and London — and it is exactly as literal as the name suggests: DPI is “the ratio of money distributed to Limited Partners by the Fund, relative to contributions.” Paid-in capital itself is “the amount of committed capital a limited partner has actually transferred to a venture fund,” not the full amount committed at the fund’s close — a fund that has called 60% of commitments is being measured against that 60%, not the full fund size, until the rest is actually drawn.
DPI is only one piece of the standard reporting trio. RVPI — “the ratio of the current value of all remaining investments within a fund to the total contributions of Limited Partners to date” — captures everything still unrealized, and the two add together into TVPI, total value to paid-in capital. Early in a fund’s life, before any exits, DPI sits at or near zero and the whole return is RVPI — the pattern ILPA’s own glossary calls the J-curve effect, where “the common practice of paying the management fee and start-up costs out of the first draw-down does not produce an equivalent book value,” so a fund “will initially show a negative return.” DPI only starts moving once cash actually comes back, which is precisely why LPs treat it as the harder, less revisable number.
A mid-market fund has called $40,000,000 of LP commitments to date and distributed $22,000,000 back in cash from two realized exits. DPI is $22,000,000 ÷ $40,000,000 = 0.55×. The fund’s remaining four portfolio companies carry a current NAV of $35,000,000, giving an RVPI of $35,000,000 ÷ $40,000,000 = 0.875×. Add the two together and TVPI is 1.425× — so on paper the fund looks like it has created meaningfully more than it has called. But an LP reading the quarterly report knows the 0.875× RVPI is a mark that can move with the next valuation cycle, while the 0.55× DPI is cash that has already left the fund and landed in LP accounts. Those two components of the same 1.425× TVPI carry very different weight in an LP’s own read on the fund.
See also: Internal rate of return · Capital commitment · Distribution waterfall.
A 30-minute call is enough to tell you whether AI pays for itself in diligence, closing and portfolio reporting.
Nobody publishes Canadian transaction data, so every valuation in this country quotes an American benchmark. We are building the Canadian one — multiples, asking-to-sale spreads and days on market, by sector and by city. Leave an email and you will see it first.
No pitch, no listings. One email when the first report lands.
