A normalisation adjustment restates a private company's historical earnings for one-time, related-party or owner-specific items, so a buyer prices the business as it would run under new, market-rate ownership rather than under its current owner's particular arrangements.
The clearest Canadian description of what gets normalised is deavo's comparison of the two earnings measures brokers use for private-company deals: seller's discretionary earnings adds back "interest, one owner's compensation and benefits, and discretionary or non-recurring expenses" to show "total cash flow available to a single owner-operator," while EBITDA treats owner pay differently, "on the assumption that the business already pays … a market wage to whoever runs it." Which measure a deal is discussed in decides which adjustments even apply.
Not every distortion can be normalised the way owner compensation can. Deavo's own article on owner-dependence draws that line directly: dependence on the departing owner "rarely shows up as a line item anywhere in the financial statements, which is exactly why it is easy for a seller to underestimate and hard for a buyer to ignore," and its effect "depends heavily on the specific industry and how replaceable the owner's role actually is." A below-market salary is a normalisation adjustment with a defensible dollar figure; the risk that customers leave with the owner is not — deavo's own source on owner-dependence gives no quantified figure for it at all, and neither does anything else available here.
Where the resulting normalised figure feeds a formal opinion, the engagement is governed by CBV Institute's Practice Standard 100, "Valuation Conclusions and Valuation Reports," which sets "the minimum requirements for a valuator to establish a credible and properly supported conclusion of value," effective for engagements beginning on or after 1 January 2026 (see Chartered Business Valuator).
A private company pays its founder $60,000 a year, though a non-owner general manager doing the same job would command roughly $140,000 in that market and sector — a fact the buyer confirms against comparable postings before relying on it. The normalisation adjustment is $140,000 minus $60,000, i.e. an $80,000 deduction from reported earnings (the business is really $80,000 less profitable once a market-rate manager is paid to run it). Separately, the founder personally holds the firm's three largest customer relationships; the buyer does not attempt to normalise that risk into a dollar figure and instead prices it through deal structure — an earn-out or a post-closing transition period — rather than a spreadsheet add-back.
See also: EBITDA bridge · Adjusted EBITDA · Discount for lack of marketability.
A 30-minute call is enough to tell you whether AI pays for itself here.
Nobody publishes Canadian transaction data, so every valuation in this country quotes an American benchmark. We are building the Canadian one — multiples, asking-to-sale spreads and days on market, by sector and by city. Leave an email and you will see it first.
No pitch, no listings. One email when the first report lands.
