Treadstone Associates
Case File № 368 · New to Canada

Three wires, three tax years, one down payment

a Kamloops newcomer file

A newcomer's Kamloops down payment was entirely their own money, from selling a business abroad -- but the source country caps how much an individual can remit out of the country each year, so the money arrived as three separate annual wires rather than one large transfer.

British ColumbiaInsured · PurchaseFiled August 9, 20265 min read
$78,000

total down payment, all of it the newcomers' own money

3

separate annual wires it took to move that money, one source-country tax year at a time

38.9%

TDS once all three wires reconciled to one sale

Anonymized illustration. The borrowers, dollar figures, and rates in this file are an illustrative composite — no real client is identifiable, and any rate shown is illustrative, not a quote. The rules are real: every regulatory figure is cited to its source in the Sources section, and the math computes exactly as shown.

№ 01

The client

Newcomer permanent residents in Kamloops, with $9,800/month combined income, put $78,000 (15%) down on a $520,000 purchase. Every dollar of the down payment traces to the sale of a business in their home country -- but that country limits how much foreign currency an individual can remit abroad in a single year.

Purchase price

$520,000

Kamloops

Down payment

$78,000 (15%)

Arrived across three annual wires

Source of funds

Sale of a business abroad

One sale, three transfers

Combined income

$9,800/month

Both employed in Canada

№ 02

The problem

Most down payment source-of-funds checklists are built around a single large, sudden wire: prove where it came from, show it landing, done. This file didn't have one large wire — it had three, roughly $26,000 each, arriving a year apart, because the source country's own foreign-exchange rules cap how much an individual can move abroad annually.

Why the money couldn't come in one transfer

  • The source country limits individual foreign-currency remittances to a set amount per calendar year
  • The business sale closed all at once, but the proceeds had to be moved out over three of the source country's own fiscal years
  • Three separate wires, three years apart, look like three unrelated deposits unless tied back to one transaction

The challenge wasn't proving the money was legitimate — it clearly was. It was proving that three transfers, spread across three tax years, were all pieces of the same one sale.

№ 03

The numbers

Once the three wires reconciled to a single source, the mortgage math itself was a routine insured purchase.

The insured purchase, down payment reconciledAmount
Purchase price$520,000
Down payment (15%), across 3 annual wires of $26,000 each$78,000
Base mortgage$442,000
CMHC premium — 2.80% at 80.01-85% LTV+$12,376
Total insured mortgage$454,376
Qualifying the fileFigure
Minimum qualifying rate on a 4.85% contract rate6.85%
Payment at the qualifying rate, 25 years$3,141/mo
GDS (payment + $290 tax + $125 heat) ÷ $9,800 income36.3%
TDS (GDS numerator + $260 car loan) ÷ $9,800 income38.9%

Both ratios sit inside CMHC's maximums; the file's real work was entirely in the down payment reconciliation, not the ratio math -- exactly the kind of file Canada's own down payment statistics don't capture, since they can't distinguish a one-wire down payment from a three-wire one.

№ 04

The solution

A submortgage broker working under BC's Registrar of Mortgage Brokers, drawing on the same principles covered in a source of funds review, built one reconciliation spanning three tax years instead of treating each wire as its own question.

First, obtained the original business-sale agreement. This established the total sale proceeds and the date of sale, the anchor point every later transfer needed to trace back to.

Second, gathered all three years' wire confirmations and the source-country bank statements bracketing each transfer. Each wire showed the same source account, debited in three tranches consistent with the country's own annual remittance cap.

Third, built a single reconciliation schedule tying all three wires back to the one sale. Total transferred ($78,000) matched a portion of the sale proceeds, with the gap explained by funds the sellers retained abroad or converted at different points.

Business-sale agreement, showing total proceeds and sale date
Three years of wire confirmations, one per annual transfer
Source-country bank statements bracketing each of the three wires
A written reconciliation tying all three transfers back to the one sale
Canadian bank statements showing each wire landing
№ 05

The outcome

The lender accepted the full $78,000 down payment once the three-wire reconciliation tied cleanly back to the business sale. GDS settled at 36.3% and TDS at 38.9%, both inside CMHC's maximums, and British Columbia's property transfer tax on the purchase came to $8,400 -- full rate, since the buyers hadn't yet met the province's own residency requirement for the first-time-buyer exemption.

Foreign-exchange and capital-control rules are set entirely by the source country and vary widely -- this file's annual cap is illustrative of the pattern, not a specific country's published rule.

№ 06

What to take from this file

  • 01Not every large foreign down payment arrives in one wire. A source country's own remittance limits can force a legitimate, single-source transfer into several annual pieces.
  • 02Build one reconciliation spanning every transfer, not a separate story for each wire. Three unrelated-looking deposits are a red flag; three tranches of one documented sale are not.
  • 03Ask early whether a newcomer's home country restricts outbound transfers. It changes the shape of the source-of-funds file from the very first conversation.
  • 04BC's first-time-buyer property transfer tax exemption has its own residency requirement. A newcomer who has never owned a home can still owe full tax if they haven't yet met BC's residency test.
  • 05The down payment's legitimacy and its documentation are two separate jobs. This money was never in doubt; proving it took the shape a checklist expected was the actual work.

Sources

Every regulatory figure in this file traces to one of these primary sources. Client details and anything that varies by lender are illustrative, as flagged below.

Illustrative in this file — lender-specific, not rules:

  • 4.85% contract rate — rates move daily; not a quote.
  • the source country's annual remittance cap — foreign-exchange and capital-control rules are set by the source country, not by any Canadian regulator, and vary by country.

Authority & provenance

How this case file was built

We publish the origin, the verification method and the reviewer for every case file, so you can judge how far to trust it before you rely on it with a client.

Where it comes from

Derived from files handled by Treadstone’s fulfillment desk and from scenarios contributed by partner brokerages. Names, employers, exact amounts and dates are changed so no client or file is identifiable.

Provenance: Composite — a pattern seen repeatedly on fulfilled files, not a single transaction.

What is verified

Every regulatory figure traces to a primary source listed above and was checked against it on the date shown. The arithmetic is recomputed by machine on every rebuild.

Anything that varies by lender is labelled illustrative rather than stated as a rule.

Who reviewed it

Reviewed for Canadian regulatory accuracy before publication, and re-checked whenever a cited rule changes.

Reviewed by: Nicholas Parson, Treadstone Associates — reviews every case file before publication.

First published 9 August 2026Rules last verified 9 August 2026Next scheduled review 9 February 2027

This case file is professional reference material for licensed mortgage professionals. It is not advice to a borrower, and it is not a lender commitment. Insurer rules, qualifying rates and provincial taxes change — confirm the current position with the insurer, regulator or lender before you rely on any figure here in a live file.

Treadstone fulfillment

Files like this are daily work for our desk.

Document collection, ratio math under multiple treatments, lender placement notes, and submission-ready packaging — for Canadian mortgage brokers who would rather be in front of clients.