Treadstone Associates
Case File № 303 · Private Lending & Exit

The appraisal that came in short

a Miramichi private exit priced against a lower value

The property behind a Miramichi private first mortgage appraised well under its original value at exit. The new A-lender's maximum loan fell $9,400 short of the private payout — a gap the household closed in cash, not by hoping a second private lender would bridge it.

New BrunswickPrivate → A-lender exitFiled August 9, 20265 min read
$28,000

drop in appraised value since the private mortgage funded

$9,400

cash shortfall between the payout balance and the new lender’s maximum loan

29.0%

TDS on the new, smaller loan

Anonymized illustration. The borrowers, dollar figures, and rates in this file are an illustrative composite — no real client is identifiable, and any rate shown is illustrative, not a quote. The rules are real: every regulatory figure is cited to its source in the Sources section, and the math computes exactly as shown.

№ 01

The client

A homeowner in Miramichi took out a $195,000 private first mortgage against a property that appraised at $260,000 when the loan funded. At exit, with the private term maturing, the local market had softened enough that a new appraisal came in materially lower.

Original appraisal

$260,000

At private-mortgage origination

Exit appraisal

$232,000

Reflecting a softer local market

Private payout balance

$195,000

Due at exit

Household income

$6,800/mo

Other debt $280/mo

Savings available

$20,000

To cover any shortfall in cash

№ 02

The problem

A new lender sizes its loan against today's value, not the value the private mortgage funded against. Loan-to-value is calculated on the exit appraisal, and that appraisal had moved against this file.

The gap, in one line

  • New lender's maximum loan, 80% of the $232,000 exit appraisal: $185,600
  • Private payout balance owed: $195,000
  • Shortfall the household must cover from another source: $9,400

The client's first instinct was to assume a second private lender would simply cover the difference. That path exists, but it replaces one exit problem with a new, smaller private mortgage that will eventually need its own exit — not a fix, just a postponement.

№ 03

The numbers

The new lender's loan is sized to the lower of the two values in play here — and in a private-to-A-lender exit, that number is what actually governs how much cash has to come from somewhere else.

Sizing the exit against the lower appraisalAmount
Exit appraisal$232,000
New lender's maximum loan (80% LTV)$185,600
Private payout balance owed$195,000
Shortfall to cover in cash$9,400
Rate & paymentsFigure
Contract rate, new A-lender (illustrative, not a quote)5.35%
Minimum qualifying rate7.35%
Monthly P&I at the qualifying rate1,340
Monthly P&I at the contract rate1,117
TDS on the new loanFigure
Housing costs (P&I + tax + heat)1,690
TDS29.0%

After covering the $9,400 shortfall from the $20,000 available, the household has $10,600 left in savings — the exit closed, but it used real cash, not paper equity that turned out not to be there.

№ 04

The solution

An FCNB-licensed mortgage broker treated the shortfall as a cash-planning problem to solve directly, not a reason to look for another private lender.

First, confirmed the shortfall in writing once the exit appraisal came back, rather than waiting to discover the gap at the lawyer's table.

Second, closed the $9,400 gap from the household's own $20,000 in savings, keeping the exit to a single, permanent A-lender mortgage rather than layering in a new private loan to bridge it.

Original appraisal from private-mortgage origination, for comparison
New exit appraisal from a lender-approved appraiser
Private lender's payout statement
90-day source-of-funds trail for the cash covering the shortfall
Income and debt documentation for the new lender
№ 05

The outcome

The exit closed on the new lender's $185,600 loan, with the $9,400 gap covered in cash and $10,600 left in savings afterward. TDS on the smaller loan settled at 29.0%.

Because this is a refinance with no change of ownership, New Brunswick's real property transfer tax does not apply here.

№ 06

What to take from this file

  • 01A private mortgage's original appraisal is not a guarantee for the exit. Local values can move against a file between funding and maturity.
  • 02A new lender sizes its loan to today's value, not the original one. Loan-to-value is recalculated at exit, every time.
  • 03A second private lender can bridge a shortfall — but it usually just postpones the same exit problem. Ask what the new loan's own exit will look like before recommending it.
  • 04Confirm a shortfall in writing before waiving conditions. Finding it at the lawyer's table leaves no time to plan around it.
  • 05A refinance never triggers provincial transfer tax. Only a change of ownership does.

Sources

Every regulatory figure in this file traces to one of these primary sources. Client details and anything that varies by lender are illustrative, as flagged below.

Illustrative in this file — lender-specific, not rules:

  • 5.35% contract rate — rates move daily; not a quote.
  • the 80% maximum LTV — each uninsured lender sets its own maximum loan-to-value for a refinance; illustrative here, not a universal rule.
  • the 44% comfort reference — this file is uninsured, so there is no CMHC ratio ceiling -- 44% is a common internal comfort line, not a regulatory cap.

Authority & provenance

How this case file was built

We publish the origin, the verification method and the reviewer for every case file, so you can judge how far to trust it before you rely on it with a client.

Where it comes from

Derived from files handled by Treadstone’s fulfillment desk and from scenarios contributed by partner brokerages. Names, employers, exact amounts and dates are changed so no client or file is identifiable.

Provenance: Composite — a pattern seen repeatedly on fulfilled files, not a single transaction.

What is verified

Every regulatory figure traces to a primary source listed above and was checked against it on the date shown. The arithmetic is recomputed by machine on every rebuild.

Anything that varies by lender is labelled illustrative rather than stated as a rule.

Who reviewed it

Reviewed for Canadian regulatory accuracy before publication, and re-checked whenever a cited rule changes.

Reviewed by: Nicholas Parson, Treadstone Associates — reviews every case file before publication.

First published 9 August 2026Rules last verified 9 August 2026Next scheduled review 9 February 2027

This case file is professional reference material for licensed mortgage professionals. It is not advice to a borrower, and it is not a lender commitment. Insurer rules, qualifying rates and provincial taxes change — confirm the current position with the insurer, regulator or lender before you rely on any figure here in a live file.

Treadstone fulfillment

Files like this are daily work for our desk.

Document collection, ratio math under multiple treatments, lender placement notes, and submission-ready packaging — for Canadian mortgage brokers who would rather be in front of clients.