Treadstone Associates
Case File № 080 · Private Lending & Exit

From the family note to an institutional lender

exiting an inter-family private mortgage in Trois-Rivières

A private, interest-only mortgage from parents to their child got the child into the home when income and credit weren’t yet strong enough for an institutional lender. Three years of steady T4 employment later, the child refinanced out to an institutional lender at 52.9% LTV, ending an interest-only note that had reduced the balance by exactly nothing.

QuebecUninsured · RefinanceFiled August 7, 20265 min read
$975

Old interest-only payment to the family — balance never moved

$1,046

New institutional P&I payment — amortizing from day one

52.9%

Loan-to-value at refinance, appraised-value basis

Anonymized illustration. The borrowers, dollar figures, and rates in this file are an illustrative composite — no real client is identifiable, and any rate shown is illustrative, not a quote. The rules are real: every regulatory figure is cited to its source in the Sources section, and the math computes exactly as shown.

№ 01

The client

Three years ago, a homebuyer in Trois-Rivières didn’t yet have the income history or credit for an institutional mortgage. The parents stepped in with a private, interest-only note secured against the home — informal, with no fixed term, priced between family members rather than at a market rate.

Private note

$180,000, interest-only

6.5% informal rate, no fixed term

Borrower today

3 years of steady T4 employment

Established credit, combined income $7,167/mo

Appraised value

$340,000

52.9% LTV at refinance

Debts

Car loan $180/mo

№ 02

The problem

The private note did what it was meant to do — it got the family into the home. But interest-only means the $975-a-month payment never touches the $180,000 balance, and a note with no fixed term leaves no scheduled path to ever paying it off.

Three years on, the borrower’s own T4 employment and credit history are strong enough to qualify with an institutional lender on their own — the alternative-credit case the family note substituted for is no longer needed.

№ 03

The numbers

At 52.9% LTV, an institutional refinance here is comfortably uninsured — well under the 80% threshold where default insurance would even be a question.

The payout refinanceAmount
Appraised value$340,000
Private balance paid out$180,000
Resulting LTV52.9%
Payment comparisonFigure
Old private note — interest-only at 6.5%$975/mo
New institutional contract rate (illustrative, not a quote)4.99%
Minimum qualifying rate6.99%
New payment at the qualifying rate (25-year amortization)$1,260/mo
New payment at the contract rate$1,046/mo

Because this is a new mortgage to a new lender — not a straight switch between two federally regulated institutions at renewal — the full minimum qualifying rate applies. There is no exemption path for a private-to-institutional payout, even though the balance and the borrower are unchanged from three years ago.

TDS comes to 25.5% against combined income — comfortably serviceable, though on this uninsured file it is informational rather than a pass/fail line against a regulatory ceiling.

№ 04

The solution

A courtier hypothécaire licensed with Quebec’s AMF packaged the file as a standard payout refinance: three years of T4s and NOAs, a fresh appraisal supporting the $340,000 value, and a payout statement from the parents confirming the exact balance owing on the private note.

The exit strategy here was always the plan, not an afterthought — private and inter-family lending works when everyone understands from the start how the borrower gets to an institutional lender eventually, the same principle our piece on why every private deal needs an exit strategy sets out for arm’s-length private deals too.

№ 05

The outcome

Funded: the institutional lender paid out the private note in full, and the family’s private mortgage was discharged from title. The old interest-only note’s $975 payment became a $1,046 amortizing one — $71 more a month, but for the first time actually reducing the balance rather than holding it flat.

A national arrears rate this low is part of why lenders are comfortable underwriting a well-documented inter-family payout on its own merits, without treating the private history as a mark against the file.

№ 06

What to take from this file

  • 01Interest-only never builds equity on its own. A flat $975-a-month payment for three years reduced the $180,000 balance by exactly nothing.
  • 02There is no MQR exemption for a private-to-institutional payout. Only a straight switch between two federally regulated lenders at renewal qualifies — a new mortgage from a new lender is tested at the full stress rate regardless of how long-standing the underlying arrangement was.
  • 03Document the private note like any other liability being discharged. A payout statement from the family, not just a verbal confirmation, is what a lender and the file both need.
  • 04A higher payment isn’t always the worse outcome. $71 more a month bought the borrower an amortizing mortgage instead of a flat one that never moved.

Sources

Every regulatory figure in this file traces to one of these primary sources. Client details and anything that varies by lender are illustrative, as flagged below.

Illustrative in this file — lender-specific, not rules:

  • 6.5% family-note rate / 4.99% institutional contract rate — the family rate was informal and never a market quote; the institutional rate moves daily and is not a quote either.
  • the TDS figure — this file is uninsured, so there is no CMHC ratio ceiling — the number is informational, not a pass/fail line.

Authority & provenance

How this case file was built

We publish the origin, the verification method and the reviewer for every case file, so you can judge how far to trust it before you rely on it with a client.

Where it comes from

Derived from files handled by Treadstone’s fulfillment desk and from scenarios contributed by partner brokerages. Names, employers, exact amounts and dates are changed so no client or file is identifiable.

Provenance: Composite — a pattern seen repeatedly on fulfilled files, not a single transaction.

What is verified

Every regulatory figure traces to a primary source listed above and was checked against it on the date shown. The arithmetic is recomputed by machine on every rebuild.

Anything that varies by lender is labelled illustrative rather than stated as a rule.

Who reviewed it

Reviewed for Canadian regulatory accuracy before publication, and re-checked whenever a cited rule changes.

Reviewed by: Nicholas Parson, Treadstone Associates — reviews every case file before publication.

First published 7 August 2026Rules last verified 7 August 2026Next scheduled review 7 February 2027

This case file is professional reference material for licensed mortgage professionals. It is not advice to a borrower, and it is not a lender commitment. Insurer rules, qualifying rates and provincial taxes change — confirm the current position with the insurer, regulator or lender before you rely on any figure here in a live file.

Treadstone fulfillment

Files like this are daily work for our desk.

Document collection, ratio math under multiple treatments, lender placement notes, and submission-ready packaging — for Canadian mortgage brokers who would rather be in front of clients.