Treadstone Associates
Case File № 304 · Private Lending & Exit

Called ‘open,’ priced closed

a Moose Jaw private exit that needed the actual mortgage read

A Moose Jaw borrower had been told their private first mortgage was open — repayable anytime, no penalty. The registered charge and commitment letter said otherwise, and a $3,282 closed-term discharge penalty only surfaced once the broker read the actual documents.

SaskatchewanPrivate → A-lender exitFiled August 9, 20265 min read
$0

penalty the client had been told to expect — described as an open mortgage

$3,282

actual discharge penalty per the registered charge and commitment letter

28.3%

TDS on the exit refinance

Anonymized illustration. The borrowers, dollar figures, and rates in this file are an illustrative composite — no real client is identifiable, and any rate shown is illustrative, not a quote. The rules are real: every regulatory figure is cited to its source in the Sources section, and the math computes exactly as shown.

№ 01

The client

A homeowner in Moose Jaw arranged a $150,000 private first mortgage through an acquaintance who described it, in good faith, as an open mortgage — repayable anytime, with no prepayment penalty. When the household approached a broker to exit to an A-lender, that description was the only thing anyone had actually checked.

Private mortgage balance

$150,000

8.75% interest-only, per the arranger's description

Assumed exit cost

$0

Per the verbal description of an ‘open’ mortgage

Actual commitment letter

Closed term

Three months’ interest discharge penalty clause

Household income

$6,000/mo

Other debt $310/mo

New lender’s offer

5.05% fixed

Illustrative, 25-year amortization

№ 02

The problem

Private mortgage terms are set individually, per file, by whoever arranges them — there is no standard form guaranteeing that a mortgage described as open actually is one. The only way to know for certain is to read the registered charge and the commitment letter themselves, not the summary someone gives verbally.

What the actual documents said

  • Registered charge and commitment letter both specify a closed term
  • Discharge penalty clause: three months’ interest on the $150,000 balance
  • Actual penalty: $3,282 — not the $0 the borrower expected

Acting on the verbal description alone — timing the exit as if no penalty applied — would have meant discovering the real cost only once the discharge statement arrived, with no room left to plan around it. Every private deal needs a clear exit strategy defined before the money moves, and reading the actual documents rather than a summary of them is the first step of that plan.

№ 03

The numbers

The penalty itself was priced first, before anything else about the exit was finalized, so the household could decide how to pay it with full information.

Pricing the actual discharge penaltyAmount
Interest-only payment at the private rate1,094/mo
Discharge penalty (three months’ interest)$3,282
Rate & payments, the refinanceFigure
Contract rate, new A-lender (illustrative, not a quote)5.05%
Minimum qualifying rate7.05%
Monthly P&I at the qualifying rate1,055
Monthly P&I at the contract rate877
TDS on the refinanceFigure
Housing costs (P&I + tax + heat)1,390
TDS28.3%

The $150,000 balance itself never changed — only the penalty, paid separately in cash, was new information.

№ 04

The solution

An FCAA-licensed Saskatchewan mortgage broker went to the primary documents before pricing anything.

First, obtained and read the actual registered charge and commitment letter, rather than relying on the borrower's or the original arranger's description of the terms.

Second, confirmed the $3,282 penalty amount with the private lender directly, in writing, before the household made any decision about timing.

Third, had the household pay the penalty from savings rather than finance it into the new mortgage, keeping the new loan sized to the balance alone.

Registered charge (the security instrument itself)
Original commitment letter from the private lender
Written confirmation of the exact penalty amount
Current mortgage statement confirming the balance
Income and debt documentation for the A-lender exit
№ 05

The outcome

The exit closed on the unchanged $150,000 balance at the new lender's rate, with TDS at 28.3% and the $3,282 penalty paid in cash, not rolled into the mortgage.

Saskatchewan's own mortgage-registration fee applies at closing, but the current fee schedule could not be independently verified, so no dollar figure is quoted here.

№ 06

What to take from this file

  • 01Read the actual mortgage instrument before pricing an exit. A verbal description of the terms — even given in good faith — is not a substitute for the registered charge.
  • 02‘Open’ and ‘closed’ are specific, documented terms, not casual descriptions. The two carry very different exit costs.
  • 03Private mortgage penalty clauses are negotiated per file. A three-months’-interest penalty is one common structure, not a universal rule.
  • 04Confirm the exact penalty in writing before the client commits to a timeline. Discovering it at the discharge statement leaves no room to plan.
  • 05Paying a penalty in cash keeps the new mortgage sized to the balance alone. Financing it in only grows what the new lender has to qualify.

Sources

Every regulatory figure in this file traces to one of these primary sources. Client details and anything that varies by lender are illustrative, as flagged below.

Illustrative in this file — lender-specific, not rules:

  • 8.75% / 5.05% contract rates — rates move daily; neither is a quote.
  • the three-months’-interest penalty clause — private mortgage terms are negotiated per file; this is one common structure, not a universal one.
  • the 44% comfort reference — this file is uninsured, so there is no CMHC ratio ceiling -- 44% is a common internal comfort line, not a regulatory cap.

Authority & provenance

How this case file was built

We publish the origin, the verification method and the reviewer for every case file, so you can judge how far to trust it before you rely on it with a client.

Where it comes from

Derived from files handled by Treadstone’s fulfillment desk and from scenarios contributed by partner brokerages. Names, employers, exact amounts and dates are changed so no client or file is identifiable.

Provenance: Composite — a pattern seen repeatedly on fulfilled files, not a single transaction.

What is verified

Every regulatory figure traces to a primary source listed above and was checked against it on the date shown. The arithmetic is recomputed by machine on every rebuild.

Anything that varies by lender is labelled illustrative rather than stated as a rule.

Who reviewed it

Reviewed for Canadian regulatory accuracy before publication, and re-checked whenever a cited rule changes.

Reviewed by: Nicholas Parson, Treadstone Associates — reviews every case file before publication.

First published 9 August 2026Rules last verified 9 August 2026Next scheduled review 9 February 2027

This case file is professional reference material for licensed mortgage professionals. It is not advice to a borrower, and it is not a lender commitment. Insurer rules, qualifying rates and provincial taxes change — confirm the current position with the insurer, regulator or lender before you rely on any figure here in a live file.

Treadstone fulfillment

Files like this are daily work for our desk.

Document collection, ratio math under multiple treatments, lender placement notes, and submission-ready packaging — for Canadian mortgage brokers who would rather be in front of clients.