Treadstone Associates
Case File № 587 · Self-Employed Income

The NOA that was already out of date

a Guelph self-employed file rebuilt on CRA's own current record

A self-employed Guelph borrower's original Notice of Assessment no longer matched CRA's own current record after a reassessment raised net income. A first lender kept qualifying on the stale figure until a CRA Proof of Income Statement corrected the two-year average from $8,100/mo to $9,100/mo, funding insured at 40.1% TDS.

OntarioInsured · PurchaseFiled August 9, 20265 min read
45.0%

total debt service using the stale, pre-reassessment NOA figure — over CMHC's 44% ceiling

40.1%

total debt service once CRA's current-record Proof of Income Statement replaced it

$1,000/mo

the gap between the stale NOA figure and CRA's own current, reassessed record for the same year

Anonymized illustration. The borrowers, dollar figures, and rates in this file are an illustrative composite — no real client is identifiable, and any rate shown is illustrative, not a quote. The rules are real: every regulatory figure is cited to its source in the Sources section, and the math computes exactly as shown.

№ 01

The client

A self-employed Guelph borrower buying a $452,000 home at 10% down, qualifying on a two-year average of net self-employment income.

Purchase price

$452,000, Guelph

10% down, insured

Year 1 income

$8,000/mo

unaffected by any reassessment

Year 2 income, original NOA

$8,200/mo

the figure the first lender relied on

Year 2 income, CRA's current record

$10,200/mo

after CRA disallowed a claimed expense

№ 02

The problem

The Notice of Assessment on file for Year 2 showed $8,200/mo — but CRA had since reassessed that return, disallowing a claimed expense and raising net income to $10,200/mo. The first lender's file still relied on the original, now-superseded NOA, treating an out-of-date document as though it were CRA's current record.

What a reassessment actually changes

  • CRA can reassess a filed return after the original NOA has already issued, adjusting the assessed income up or down
  • The original NOA does not update itself — it simply becomes superseded
  • A CRA Proof of Income Statement reflects CRA's own CURRENT record, whichever document produced it

Nobody disputed the reassessment itself; the client's own accountant had already accepted it. The file simply hadn't caught up to what CRA's own records now showed.

№ 03

The numbers

The two-year average moved meaningfully once the correct, current figure replaced the superseded one.

The two-year averageAmount
Purchase price$452,000
CMHC premium (3.10% at 90% LTV)+$12,611
Total insured mortgage$419,411
Two-year averageStale NOACRA's current record
Year 1 income$8,000/mo$8,000/mo
Year 2 income$8,200/mo$10,200/mo
Two-year average$8,100/mo$9,100/mo
GDS41.9%37.3%
TDS45.0%40.1%

At 45.0% TDS, the stale figure put this file over CMHC's 44% ceiling entirely; at 40.1% TDS on CRA's own current record, it clears comfortably. See the full two-year average walkthrough for how the averaging itself works.

№ 04

The solution

A mortgage agent licensed under Ontario's Mortgage Brokerages, Lenders and Administrators Act would not accept a Year 2 figure the client's own accountant confirmed CRA had already superseded.

First, confirmed the reassessment with the client's accountant. CRA had disallowed a claimed expense, which raised net business income for that year — a real, documented change, not a dispute in progress.

Second, pulled a CRA Proof of Income Statement. This is CRA's own current-record document, distinct from the original NOA, and it confirmed the post-reassessment figure directly from CRA rather than secondhand.

Third, moved the file to a lender willing to requalify on the corrected average. Read alongside the full picture of how Canadian lenders actually read self-employed income, the correction was a straightforward one once the right document was in hand.

Confirmation from the client's accountant that a reassessment had occurred
A CRA Proof of Income Statement showing the current, post-reassessment figure
Both years' NOAs alongside the Proof of Income Statement, for a complete file
A lender willing to requalify the two-year average on the corrected figure
№ 05

The outcome

The purchase funded insured at 37.3% GDS and 40.1% TDS, on an average that finally matched CRA's own current record rather than a document a reassessment had already superseded.

Because this file is CMHC-insured, the 40.1% TDS figure is measured against the real 44% ceiling; the stale figure's 45.0% would have failed it outright.

№ 06

What to take from this file

  • 01A Notice of Assessment can become out of date. A post-filing CRA reassessment supersedes it without the original document ever changing.
  • 02A CRA Proof of Income Statement shows CRA's own CURRENT record. When a reassessment is in play, it is the document to pull, not the original NOA.
  • 03This kind of correction can move a file either direction. Here it raised income; a reassessment can just as easily lower it, and the same document check applies.
  • 04Confirm with the client's accountant before treating any NOA as final. They will know about a reassessment long before it shows up anywhere else in the file.

Sources

Every regulatory figure in this file traces to one of these primary sources. Client details and anything that varies by lender are illustrative, as flagged below.

Illustrative in this file — lender-specific, not rules:

  • 4.95% contract rate — rates move daily; not a quote.
  • the reassessment's own dollar figures — every reassessment's adjustment is specific to that file's own CRA review; this reflects one file's own figures, not a formula.

Authority & provenance

How this case file was built

We publish the origin, the verification method and the reviewer for every case file, so you can judge how far to trust it before you rely on it with a client.

Where it comes from

Derived from files handled by Treadstone’s fulfillment desk and from scenarios contributed by partner brokerages. Names, employers, exact amounts and dates are changed so no client or file is identifiable.

Provenance: Composite — a pattern seen repeatedly on fulfilled files, not a single transaction.

What is verified

Every regulatory figure traces to a primary source listed above and was checked against it on the date shown. The arithmetic is recomputed by machine on every rebuild.

Anything that varies by lender is labelled illustrative rather than stated as a rule.

Who reviewed it

Reviewed for Canadian regulatory accuracy before publication, and re-checked whenever a cited rule changes.

Reviewed by: Nicholas Parson, Treadstone Associates — reviews every case file before publication.

First published 9 August 2026Rules last verified 9 August 2026Next scheduled review 9 February 2027

This case file is professional reference material for licensed mortgage professionals. It is not advice to a borrower, and it is not a lender commitment. Insurer rules, qualifying rates and provincial taxes change — confirm the current position with the insurer, regulator or lender before you rely on any figure here in a live file.

Treadstone fulfillment

Files like this are daily work for our desk.

Document collection, ratio math under multiple treatments, lender placement notes, and submission-ready packaging — for Canadian mortgage brokers who would rather be in front of clients.