Treadstone Associates
Case File № 168 · Self-Employed Income

The T5018s that didn’t add up

reconciling a Miramichi forestry contractor’s income

A Miramichi forestry contractor was paid by several mills, each issuing its own T5018. Unable to reconcile the slips, the first lender applied a heavy haircut, putting TDS at 86.7%; full reconciliation against deposits brought it to 43.4%.

New BrunswickInsured · 90% LTVFiled August 7, 20265 min read
86.7%

TDS after the unreconciled haircut — declined

43.4%

TDS after full T5018 reconciliation — approved

39/44

CMHC’s maximum GDS / TDS for insured files

Anonymized illustration. The borrowers, dollar figures, and rates in this file are an illustrative composite — no real client is identifiable, and any rate shown is illustrative, not a quote. The rules are real: every regulatory figure is cited to its source in the Sources section, and the math computes exactly as shown.

№ 01

The client

A forestry contractor working the harvest around Miramichi, paid by several different mills over the course of a year, each issuing its own T5018 Statement of Contract Payments. Two filed T1 years show net contracting income of $54,000 and $72,000 — solid, but scattered across paperwork from multiple payers that didn’t obviously line up with the bank deposits.

Business

Forestry contractor, sole proprietorship

Paid by several mills, multiple T5018 slips per year

Two filed years

$54,000, then $72,000

Two-year average $5,250/mo

Credit picture

Good standing, one equipment loan

Equipment loan $380/mo

Purchase

$245,000, Miramichi

Property tax $160/mo; lender heat estimate $95/mo

Down payment

$24,500 — 10%

Under 20%, so the file must be default-insured

Regulator

New Brunswick mortgage associate

Financial and Consumer Services Commission of New Brunswick (FCNB)

№ 02

The problem

The first underwriter, faced with T5018 slips from three different mills that didn’t individually match the bank deposits (payments arrived net of harvest-related deductions, staggered across weeks), couldn’t reconcile the paperwork with confidence — and fell back on a conservative haircut instead.

The unreconciled haircut

  • Two-year average net income: ($54,000 + $72,000) ÷ 2 = $63,000/yr, $5,250/mo
  • A 50% haircut applied for unreconciled multi-payer income: $2,625/mo
  • TDS: 86.7% against CMHC’s 44% maximum. Declined.

The income itself was never in doubt — two consecutive filed years, both assessed by the CRA, and both built the way our guide to calculating self-employed income from a T1 and T2 lays out. What tripped the file was documentation: three mills' worth of T5018s, each with its own timing and deduction pattern, is genuinely harder to trace to a bank statement than a single employer's T4. Our piece on contract and T4A income and proving continuance covers the documentation challenge multi-payer contract income creates, and our piece on rebuilding a file when the two-year average is unusable covers what happens when that documentation gap cannot be closed at all.

№ 03

The numbers

At 10% down this is an insured file: CMHC’s maximums — GDS 39%, TDS 44% — apply as hard numbers.

Structuring the insured loanAmount
Purchase price$245,000
Down payment (10%)−$24,500
Base mortgage (90% LTV)$220,500
CMHC premium — 3.10% in the 85.01–90% LTV band, capitalized+$6,836
Total insured mortgage$227,336

The minimum down payment at this price is $12,250 — 5% of the purchase price, since $245,000 sits under the $500,000 tier boundary — so $24,500 clears it comfortably.

Rate & paymentsFigure
Contract rate — 5-year fixed (illustrative, not a quote)5.35%
Minimum qualifying rate — greater of contract + 2% and 5.25%7.35%
Monthly P&I at the qualifying rate — the ratios run on this$1,642
Monthly P&I at the contract rate — what he actually pays$1,368

Income — the haircut vs. the reconciled figure

Income treatmentMonthly
Two-year average net income ($54,000 + $72,000 ÷ 2)$5,250
50% haircut for unreconciled multi-payer income$2,625
Fully reconciled two-year average$5,250

TDS — the haircut vs. the reconciled figure

TDS line50% haircut appliedFully reconciled income
Housing costs (PI + tax + heat)$1,897$1,897
Equipment loan$380$380
Income used$2,625$5,250
TDS vs. the 44% cap86.7%  ✗43.4%  ✓

GDS on the fully reconciled income comes to 36.1%, inside the 39% cap. Once every T5018 was matched to its corresponding deposit, the income wasn’t discounted at all — the haircut disappeared entirely, because it existed only to cover for paperwork the first lender couldn’t trace, not because the money wasn’t real.

№ 04

The solution

A New Brunswick mortgage associate, licensed with the FCNB, treated the file as a reconciliation problem rather than an income problem from the outset.

First, obtained every T5018 slip from every mill for both filed years — not just a summary, but each individual statement of contract payments.

Second, matched every slip to its corresponding bank deposit, accounting for the timing lag and the harvest-related deductions each mill applied before payment — the exact gap that had confused the first underwriter.

Third, placed the fully reconciled file with a lender comfortable with multi-payer T2125 contract income, submitting the reconciliation itself as part of the package rather than leaving the underwriter to attempt it independently:

Every T5018 slip from every paying mill, for both filed years
A payment-to-deposit reconciliation schedule, mill by mill
Two years of T1 Statements of Business Activities and matching NOAs
90-day history of the $24,500 down payment
Purchase agreement and property tax statement
№ 05

The outcome & the closing math

Approved and funded: insured at 90% LTV, 25-year amortization, 5-year fixed, for a mortgage that can be weighed against our data on the average new mortgage amount in Canada. The last piece of broker work was confirming the cash needed at closing beyond the down payment.

Cash due at closing (beyond the down payment)Amount
New Brunswick real property transfer tax on $245,000 — flat 1% on the greater of price or assessed value$2,450
Legal fees, title insurance & adjustmentsvaries
№ 06

What to take from this file

  • 01A haircut on unreconciled income is a documentation fix waiting to happen, not a verdict on the borrower. This file swung from 86.7% to 43.4% TDS once the paperwork, not the income, was resolved.
  • 02Multi-payer T5018 income needs its own reconciliation schedule. Matching every slip to its deposit is the single document that unlocks a file like this.
  • 03Two consecutive filed years, even from several payers, is still the standard convention. The number of payers doesn’t change the averaging window — only the documentation burden.
  • 04Budget New Brunswick’s flat 1% transfer tax as real cash at closing. $2,450 was due on top of the down payment.

Sources

Every regulatory figure in this file traces to one of these primary sources. Client details and anything that varies by lender are illustrative, as flagged below.

Illustrative in this file — lender-specific, not rules:

  • 5.35% contract rate — rates move daily; not a quote.
  • 50% haircut on unreconciled income — an internal conservative-underwriting convention, not a published rule.

Authority & provenance

How this case file was built

We publish the origin, the verification method and the reviewer for every case file, so you can judge how far to trust it before you rely on it with a client.

Where it comes from

Derived from files handled by Treadstone’s fulfillment desk and from scenarios contributed by partner brokerages. Names, employers, exact amounts and dates are changed so no client or file is identifiable.

Provenance: Composite — a pattern seen repeatedly on fulfilled files, not a single transaction.

What is verified

Every regulatory figure traces to a primary source listed above and was checked against it on the date shown. The arithmetic is recomputed by machine on every rebuild.

Anything that varies by lender is labelled illustrative rather than stated as a rule.

Who reviewed it

Reviewed for Canadian regulatory accuracy before publication, and re-checked whenever a cited rule changes.

Reviewed by: Nicholas Parson, Treadstone Associates — reviews every case file before publication.

First published 7 August 2026Rules last verified 7 August 2026Next scheduled review 7 February 2027

This case file is professional reference material for licensed mortgage professionals. It is not advice to a borrower, and it is not a lender commitment. Insurer rules, qualifying rates and provincial taxes change — confirm the current position with the insurer, regulator or lender before you rely on any figure here in a live file.

Treadstone fulfillment

Files like this are daily work for our desk.

Document collection, ratio math under multiple treatments, lender placement notes, and submission-ready packaging — for Canadian mortgage brokers who would rather be in front of clients.