Treadstone Associates
Case File № 785 · Self-Employed Income

One mortgage, three incomes, three shares

a Norfolk County purchase split across a self-employed parent and two adult children

A self-employed parent and their two adult children -- one T4-salaried, one also self-employed -- bought one Norfolk County home together as three co-owners, each qualified on their own income, each holding a share matching what they actually contributed.

OntarioUninsured · PurchaseFiled August 9, 20265 min read
3

unrelated income types verified independently -- a self-employed parent's 2-year average, a straight T4 salary, and a second self-employed 2-year average

40/35/25

the registered ownership split, matching each buyer's own down-payment contribution

25.0%

total debt service across all three incomes combined

Anonymized illustration. The borrowers, dollar figures, and rates in this file are an illustrative composite — no real client is identifiable, and any rate shown is illustrative, not a quote. The rules are real: every regulatory figure is cited to its source in the Sources section, and the math computes exactly as shown.

№ 01

The client

A self-employed parent and their two adult children -- one T4-salaried, one also self-employed -- bought a $560,000 Norfolk County home together as three co-owners.

Purchase price

$560,000, Norfolk County

Uninsured, conventional

Parent's contribution

$80,000 down (40%)

Self-employed, 2-year average income

T4 child's contribution

$70,000 down (35%)

Straight T4 salary

Self-employed child's contribution

$50,000 down (25%)

Second self-employed, 2-year average income

№ 02

The problem

Three unrelated income types had to be independently verified for the same one mortgage, while the ownership shares needed to reflect three genuinely different down-payment contributions rather than an even three-way split nobody had actually funded.

What made this a three-part file, not one

  • The self-employed parent's income needed its own 2-year NOA/T2125 average, distinct from either child's
  • The second self-employed child's income needed the same treatment independently -- two self-employed 2-year averages, not one shared figure
  • None of the three had contributed an equal third of the down payment, so an even split would have registered a title that didn't match reality

Getting three incomes documented correctly was only half the file. Registering the ownership to actually match who paid for what was the other half.

№ 03

The numbers

Once each contribution was confirmed, setting the ownership split and qualifying the combined mortgage followed directly.

Three contributions, one mortgageAmount
Total down payment$200,000
Mortgage (uninsured, conventional)$360,000
Down paymentAmountShare
Self-employed parent$80,00040%
T4-salaried child$70,00035%
Self-employed child$50,00025%

The $360,000 mortgage qualifies at a combined 25.0% total debt service on $13,000/mo of income across all three -- well inside range, consistent with how average new mortgage amount data tracks a purchase at this price point. Verifying three independent income types, not the ratio itself, was the real work in this file.

№ 04

The solution

A mortgage agent licensed under Ontario's Mortgage Brokerages, Lenders and Administrators Act treated each of the three incomes as its own file within the file, while keeping the ownership documentation matched to reality from the start.

First, verified the self-employed parent's income with its own independent 2-year NOA/T2125 average, and did the same, separately, for the self-employed child -- two distinct businesses, two distinct averages.

Second, took the T4 child's income at face value from pay stubs and a letter of employment, the most straightforward of the three verifications.

Third, had all three sign a documented cost-sharing agreement fixing the 40/35/25 registered split before the purchase closed, with title registered as tenants in common at that exact ratio, matching each buyer's actual down-payment contribution rather than an even default.

Two years' NOAs and T2125s for each self-employed co-buyer, verified independently
Standard employment documentation for the T4-salaried co-buyer
A documented three-way cost-sharing agreement fixing the ownership split
Title registered as tenants in common at the agreed 40/35/25 ratio
№ 05

The outcome

The purchase funded at 4.85%, with total debt service across all three incomes at 25.0%.

Because this is an uninsured, conventional purchase at well over 20% down, CMHC's ratio maximums do not apply directly; the 25.0% figure is informational. Ontario land transfer tax on the $560,000 purchase came to $7,675.

№ 06

What to take from this file

  • 01Each self-employed income on a multi-borrower file needs its own independent 2-year average. Two self-employed co-buyers on the same mortgage are two separate verifications, never one shared figure.
  • 02Register ownership shares to match actual contributions, not an even default. A documented cost-sharing agreement at purchase prevents a dispute over who owns what later.
  • 03A multi-generational purchase can combine very different income types cleanly, provided each is verified on its own terms rather than blended together.
  • 04Ask about every intended co-owner's down-payment source up front. The ownership split should be set before the mortgage is, not worked out afterward.

Sources

Every regulatory figure in this file traces to one of these primary sources. Client details and anything that varies by lender are illustrative, as flagged below.

Illustrative in this file — lender-specific, not rules:

  • 4.85% contract rate — rates move daily; not a quote.
  • the 40/35/25 ownership split — this reflects these three buyers' own agreed contributions; there is no standard split for a multi-generational purchase.
  • the TDS figure — this is an uninsured, conventional purchase at well over 20% down -- there is no CMHC ratio ceiling; the number is informational.

Authority & provenance

How this case file was built

We publish the origin, the verification method and the reviewer for every case file, so you can judge how far to trust it before you rely on it with a client.

Where it comes from

Derived from files handled by Treadstone’s fulfillment desk and from scenarios contributed by partner brokerages. Names, employers, exact amounts and dates are changed so no client or file is identifiable.

Provenance: Composite — a pattern seen repeatedly on fulfilled files, not a single transaction.

What is verified

Every regulatory figure traces to a primary source listed above and was checked against it on the date shown. The arithmetic is recomputed by machine on every rebuild.

Anything that varies by lender is labelled illustrative rather than stated as a rule.

Who reviewed it

Reviewed for Canadian regulatory accuracy before publication, and re-checked whenever a cited rule changes.

Reviewed by: Nicholas Parson, Treadstone Associates — reviews every case file before publication.

First published 9 August 2026Rules last verified 9 August 2026Next scheduled review 9 February 2027

This case file is professional reference material for licensed mortgage professionals. It is not advice to a borrower, and it is not a lender commitment. Insurer rules, qualifying rates and provincial taxes change — confirm the current position with the insurer, regulator or lender before you rely on any figure here in a live file.

Treadstone fulfillment

Files like this are daily work for our desk.

Document collection, ratio math under multiple treatments, lender placement notes, and submission-ready packaging — for Canadian mortgage brokers who would rather be in front of clients.