Treadstone Associates
Article · 9 min read

Serving a Language Community Properly

More than one in eight Canadians speaks a language other than English or French at home, and real estate is one of the largest purchases most of them will make in that non-dominant language. Serving that community well starts with a nuance most agents get slightly wrong: language itself isn't the protected category, but it's closely tied to ones that are.

Treadstone Associates · Updated 2026

Key takeaways

  • • StatCan's 2021 Census recorded 12.7% of Canada's population speaking a language other than English or French predominantly at home, and 9,033,190 people with a mother tongue other than English or French.
  • • Ontario's Human Rights Code does not list language as its own protected ground — but the OHRC's own policy recognizes language as “an element or factor in discrimination” tied to ancestry, ethnic origin, place of origin, race, citizenship and creed.
  • • The right to equal treatment in housing under the Code explicitly covers “buying, selling, renting or being evicted” — real estate services are squarely inside its scope, not adjacent to it.
  • • Focusing marketing and service on one language community is a legitimate business decision; treating people differently because of the language they speak, in a way tied to their ancestry or place of origin, is where the Code's related grounds are engaged.
  • • This is Ontario-specific sourcing — other provinces have their own human rights codes and commissions, and their specific wording wasn't verified for this page.

The real number, not the rounded-up one

StatCan's 2021 Census release on language gives a precise figure where a lot of market chatter stays vague: “population with a mother tongue other than English or French, alone or with another language — Canada” was “9,033,190” people, and the “percentage of the population speaking a language other than English or French predominantly at home — Canada” was “12.7%,” both as of 2021. (Statistics Canada, 2021 Census) That's a real, dated, national figure worth having on hand rather than a vaguer “a lot of people” claim — and it's a meaningfully large market for any agent deciding whether serving a specific language community is worth building a dedicated practice around.

The nuance almost everyone gets slightly wrong

It's a common assumption that discriminating against someone because of the language they speak is its own violation, the way discriminating on the basis of sex or disability is. That's not quite how Ontario's Human Rights Code treats it. The OHRC's own policy statement is direct: on its own, “language is not a prohibited ground of discrimination” under Ontario's Human Rights Code. (OHRC — Policy statement on Francophones, language and discrimination) The same statement goes on to explain that the Commission's policy work and the courts nonetheless treat language as capable of being a factor “based on related Code grounds such as ancestry, ethnic origin, place of origin, race, citizenship and creed.” (OHRC) In practice, that distinction rarely changes the outcome for a real complaint — treating someone worse because of an accent or a first language is, in the OHRC's own framing, generally treating them worse because of ancestry, ethnic origin, place of origin or a related ground the language is tied to. But the precise legal hook matters if you're ever explaining the rule to a colleague: it's not language discrimination as a freestanding category, it's discrimination on a related ground that shows up through language.

Where this actually attaches to real estate services

The OHRC's summary of the race-related grounds is explicit about scope: “under the Code, every person has the right to be free from racial discrimination and harassment in the social areas of employment, services, goods, facilities, housing accommodation, contracts and membership in trade and vocational associations,” naming “ancestry, ethnicity, religion or place of origin” as the related grounds. (OHRC — Race and related grounds) The Code's own housing-specific page confirms the transaction itself is covered directly: “you have the right to equal treatment when buying, selling, renting or being evicted from an apartment, house, condominium or commercial property.” (OHRC — Housing) A real estate transaction isn't an edge case for this framework — buying and selling housing is named directly.

Building a practice that serves a community without engaging the Code the wrong way

Choosing to focus your marketing, materials, and service on a specific language community is a legitimate, common business decision — the kind that builds real trust and real referral networks inside that community. What the Code's related grounds actually reach is the reverse: treating someone worse, or refusing to serve them at all, because of the language they speak, in a way tied to where they or their family are from. A bilingual or multilingual practice that markets deliberately to one community while still serving anyone who reaches out is on solid ground; one that quietly steers non-community clients elsewhere is where the related-grounds analysis gets engaged.

A practical distinction

Serving a specific language community well: translated materials, a bilingual team member, content and events built for that community specifically. Engaging the Code’s related grounds: refusing service, offering worse terms, or making assumptions about someone’s finances or reliability because of an accent or a first language tied to their ancestry or place of origin.

A resource worth pointing colleagues to, not just quoting

The OHRC's related-grounds page lists the Francophone-and-language policy statement as one of several “relevant policies” alongside its broader work on removing the “Canadian experience” barrier and its guidance on racism and racial discrimination. (OHRC — Race and related grounds) The housing-specific page separately lists practical publications, including a “Writing a fair rental housing ad (fact sheet).” (OHRC — Housing) A brokerage building out a language-specific practice is better served pointing new agents to these primary OHRC resources directly than to a secondhand summary of them — the Commission's own wording is precise about where the line actually sits, and precision is exactly what this topic rewards.

This sourcing is Ontario-specific — the Human Rights Code and the OHRC are Ontario's framework. Other provinces run their own human rights codes and commissions with their own wording, which wasn't independently verified for this page; confirm the equivalent framework before assuming the same language applies outside Ontario. See prospecting without cold calling for the consent rules that still apply to any electronic outreach to a language-specific list, and neighbourhood invites before an open house for a channel decision that raises a similar community-targeting question.

Common questions

Is it discriminatory to advertise only in one language?

Marketing deliberately to a specific community in its own language is a common, legitimate business choice on its own; the Code's related grounds are engaged by how you treat people who approach you, not by which community your marketing is aimed at.

Does “place of origin” mean country of birth specifically?

The OHRC names it as one of several related grounds alongside ancestry, ethnicity and religion, without a narrower definition confirmed on the specific page sourced here — treat it as one of several connected categories rather than a single precise test. (OHRC)

Does this framework apply the same way to a tenant as to a buyer?

The Code's housing page covers “buying, selling, renting or being evicted” together, without drawing a distinction between a buyer and a tenant for this purpose. (OHRC — Housing)

Is the StatCan language figure from the most recent census?

It's from the 2021 Census, released August 17, 2022 — the most recent detailed linguistic-diversity release available at the time this page was sourced. (Statistics Canada)

Serving a language community well is a business decision; how you treat people is a legal one.

A short call can help you build a language-specific practice that serves clients well on both counts.