Treadstone Associates
Ask an Expert · Indemnity Mechanics

Can a buyer set off an indemnity claim against payments still owed under a vendor take-back note?

Ontario's Courts of Justice Act codifies a default set-off defence, but it requires an actual, ascertainable debt and can be excluded by clear contrary wording in the note itself — which is exactly what most vendor take-back notes contain.

Treadstone Associates · Updated 2026

Short answer

Usually not unilaterally, and often not even after the claim is proven, because a vendor take-back note is typically drafted to be paid absolutely and unconditionally, free and clear of any set-off, counterclaim or deduction of any kind — language that excludes both the purchase agreement's own set-off clause and Ontario's default statutory set-off defence.

The rule

Ontario does have a real, on-point statute here: the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, s.111, codifies a default legal set-off defence. Subsection (1) provides that “in an action for payment of a debt, the defendant may, by way of defence, claim the right to set off against the plaintiff's claim a debt owed by the plaintiff to the defendant,” and subsection (2) allows “mutual debts” to be set off “even if they are of a different nature.”

Two features keep s.111 from rescuing a buyer who simply stops paying. First, it is a defence raised inside an action the plaintiff has already brought, not a licence to withhold payment unilaterally in advance of one. Second, it requires an actual debt owed by the plaintiff, read as a liquidated or readily ascertainable sum — not a merely asserted and disputed indemnity claim that has not yet been finally determined under the purchase agreement's own claims process. And like equitable set-off, statutory set-off under s.111 can be excluded by clear contrary language, which is exactly what a note promising payment free of set-off, drafted independently of the purchase agreement, does.

When this changes

If the note is silent on set-off, or expressly cross-references the purchase agreement's own set-off clause, the analysis flips — the buyer's contractual set-off right can reach the note directly once a claim is finally determined. The clean, free-standing wording lenders typically insist on for a note they may assign is precisely what removes that option.

Where this plays out in the Case Files

These questions come up because a specific deal turned on them. Three from this hub:

Sources

See where AI pays off first in your business.

A 30-minute call is enough to tell you whether AI pays for itself here.

The Canadian benchmark

What do businesses like this one actually sell for?

Canadian small-business transaction data is not published anywhere, so most valuations in this country quote an American benchmark. The Deavo–Treadstone Acquisition Index is a daily record of Canadian listings built to replace that: asking-price distributions by province and city are published now, and days on market, departure rates and asking-to-sale spreads follow as the series lengthens. Leave an email and we will tell you as each measure lands.

No pitch, no listings. One email when the first report lands.