Treadstone Associates
Case File № 999 · Renewals & Switches

Priced off the wrong balance

a Squamish early switch's penalty, recalculated

A Squamish homeowner wanted out of a variable-rate mortgage early, into a fixed rate. The lender's first penalty quote used the original balance from years ago -- but a variable-rate mortgage's flat, three-months'-interest penalty has to be calculated on the balance actually outstanding today.

British ColumbiaUninsured · Early renewalFiled August 11, 20265 min read
$3,951

the correct penalty, three months' interest on the actual outstanding balance

$4,359

the first, overstated quote -- priced off the original balance from years earlier

$408

the difference, corrected before the switch closed

Anonymized illustration. The borrowers, dollar figures, and rates in this file are an illustrative composite — no real client is identifiable, and any rate shown is illustrative, not a quote. The rules are real: every regulatory figure is cited to its source in the Sources section, and the math computes exactly as shown.

№ 01

The client

A homeowner in Squamish wanted to lock into a fixed rate before her variable-rate mortgage reached maturity -- an early renewal, with a penalty attached. The first payout quote she received didn't match what her own mortgage statement showed she actually owed.

Original mortgage amount

$320,000

Years ago, at closing

Actual outstanding balance today

$290,000

After years of regular payments

Contract rate on the variable mortgage

5.45%

No interest rate differential applies to a variable-rate mortgage

New fixed-rate switch balance

$290,000

4.99%, 24 years

№ 02

The problem

A variable-rate mortgage carries no interest rate differential penalty at all -- there's no fixed contract rate to compare against a discounted posted rate, so breaking one early almost always costs a flat three months' interest instead. That penalty has to be calculated on the balance actually outstanding at the time of the break, at the current contract rate -- not on the amount the mortgage started at.

Where the first quote went wrong

  • The penalty calculation pulled the original $320,000 principal from the mortgage's opening documents
  • Years of regular payments had brought the actual outstanding balance down to $290,000
  • Three months' interest on the wrong, larger balance overstated the penalty by $408
  • Nothing about the mortgage terms was in dispute -- only which balance the math should have used

A flat penalty sounds simpler than an interest rate differential, and it is -- but 'simple' still means calculated on the right number.

№ 03

The numbers

Both figures use the same formula. Only the balance behind them differs.

Three months' interest, two different balancesAmount
One month's interest on the current balance ($290,000 @ 5.45%)$1,317
Correct penalty (3 months, current balance)$3,951
One month's interest on the original balance ($320,000 @ 5.45%)$1,453
Overstated first quote (3 months, original balance)$4,359

The correct penalty, $3,951, is what actually applied against her real outstanding balance. The original quote of $4,359 would have overcharged her by $408 -- a straightforward arithmetic error, not a dispute about the mortgage's terms, and one that only showed up because someone checked the balance the penalty was run against.

№ 04

The solution

A submortgage broker licensed under BC's Mortgage Brokers Act treated the penalty quote as a figure to verify against her own mortgage statement, not a number to accept at face value.

First, pulled her current mortgage statement to confirm the actual outstanding balance, rather than relying on the lender's payout department to have used it correctly.

Second, recalculated the flat three-months'-interest penalty against that confirmed balance at her current contract rate.

Third, took the corrected figure back to the lender, who confirmed the original quote had indeed been run off the opening principal rather than the current balance.

A current mortgage statement showing the actual outstanding balance
Independent recalculation of the flat penalty against that balance
Written confirmation from the lender of the corrected figure before closing
Standard early-renewal documentation for the new fixed-rate switch
№ 05

The outcome

The corrected penalty of $3,951 was confirmed and applied, $408 less than the original quote, and the early renewal closed into a fixed rate of 4.99% over 24 years.

The new fixed-rate switch itself carried no serviceability concerns; this file turned entirely on the penalty calculation, not on qualifying income.

№ 06

What to take from this file

  • 01A variable-rate mortgage's break penalty is almost always a flat three months' interest -- no interest rate differential applies. That simplicity doesn't remove the need to check the math.
  • 02The penalty must be calculated on the current outstanding balance, not the original mortgage amount. Years of payments make a real difference to that number.
  • 03Always pull a current mortgage statement before accepting a payout quote. A lender's payout desk can make the same balance error a broker can catch.
  • 04A $408 error is still worth catching. It's the client's money, and the fix cost nothing but a recalculation.

Sources

Every regulatory figure in this file traces to one of these primary sources. Client details and anything that varies by lender are illustrative, as flagged below.

Illustrative in this file — lender-specific, not rules:

  • 5.45% variable contract rate and 4.99% new fixed rate — rates move daily; not a quote.
  • $320,000 original and $290,000 current balance — illustrative deal figures consistent with this file.

Authority & provenance

How this case file was built

We publish the origin, the verification method and the reviewer for every case file, so you can judge how far to trust it before you rely on it with a client.

Where it comes from

Derived from files handled by Treadstone’s fulfillment desk and from scenarios contributed by partner brokerages. Names, employers, exact amounts and dates are changed so no client or file is identifiable.

Provenance: Composite — a pattern seen repeatedly on fulfilled files, not a single transaction.

What is verified

Every regulatory figure traces to a primary source listed above and was checked against it on the date shown. The arithmetic is recomputed by machine on every rebuild.

Anything that varies by lender is labelled illustrative rather than stated as a rule.

Who reviewed it

Reviewed for Canadian regulatory accuracy before publication, and re-checked whenever a cited rule changes.

Reviewed by: Nicholas Parson, Treadstone Associates — reviews every case file before publication.

First published 11 August 2026Rules last verified 11 August 2026Next scheduled review 11 February 2027

This case file is professional reference material for licensed mortgage professionals. It is not advice to a borrower, and it is not a lender commitment. Insurer rules, qualifying rates and provincial taxes change — confirm the current position with the insurer, regulator or lender before you rely on any figure here in a live file.

Treadstone fulfillment

Files like this are daily work for our desk.

Document collection, ratio math under multiple treatments, lender placement notes, and submission-ready packaging — for Canadian mortgage brokers who would rather be in front of clients.