An application form tells an underwriter the numbers. It does not tell them why a borrower changed jobs eight months ago, why a $6,000 deposit landed in an account in March, or why a credit report shows an R2 rating from two years back that has been clean since. A submission note exists to close that gap — to give the underwriter the context that turns an anomaly into an understood, documented fact rather than an open question that stalls the file while someone goes looking for an answer.
A useful submission note opens with a one- or two-line deal summary — purchase or refinance, property type, purchase price or property value, loan amount, and the headline ratios — so the underwriter has the shape of the file before reading anything else. It then addresses, in order of likely importance, anything in the file that is not self-explanatory: employment changes, deposits, credit history items, income structure for a self-employed or incorporated borrower, or anything else covered elsewhere in this course that does not present as a clean, default-shaped file. It closes with anything the broker specifically wants flagged as a strength — strong reserves, a long-standing banking relationship, an unusually low LTV — without overstating it.
Omitting a known weakness in the hope it goes unnoticed is the single most damaging habit a broker can develop, because it almost never works: the underwriter has access to the same documents and will find the same $9,000 deposit or the same gap in employment history regardless of whether the note mentions it. Finding it without an explanation already attached reads as either carelessness or concealment, and either one costs more goodwill on the next file than a well-explained weakness ever would have cost on this one.
Consider a self-employed borrower whose line 15000 income dropped in the more recent of their two NOA years due to a one-time equipment purchase, alongside a large deposit from the sale of a vehicle. A strong note states both facts plainly, in one or two sentences each, with the equipment invoice and the vehicle bill of sale referenced as attached, rather than leaving the underwriter to reconstruct the story from raw documents alone. That is the entire difference between a note that speeds a file up and one that does nothing at all.
Every earlier module in this course feeds directly into this one. Reading the file the way an underwriter will, understanding why the insurance category was set the way it was, calculating income and ratios correctly, and keeping the file's documents internally consistent — all of it is preparation for the moment a broker sits down to explain the file in their own words. A submission that needs no surprises explained after the fact is, in the end, the entire craft this course has been teaching from its first module onward.
An underwriter is likely to view a submission note that omits a known credit blemish, which the underwriter then discovers independently, as:
Underwriters see the same documents the broker does, so an omitted, discoverable weakness reads as either not having reviewed the file properly or having deliberately left it out — neither is a good look, and both cost credibility on future files from that broker. It is not neutral, it does not speed anything up, and submission notes that are actually used well are read closely precisely because they save the underwriter time chasing context on their own.
Lender policies change without notice. Confirm current guidelines directly with the lender or insurer before relying on them for a live file.
The intro and first module are free to read. Add your name and email once and the rest of this course opens — along with every other course on the site. No card, no trial.
Already unlocked on another device?
