Canadian lenders typically offer several payment frequency options on the same mortgage: monthly, semi-monthly, biweekly, weekly, and — critically — “accelerated” versions of biweekly and weekly. The frequency a client chooses doesn't change the interest rate or the loan amount, but it can meaningfully change how quickly the mortgage actually gets paid off, depending entirely on which version is chosen.
Take a mortgage with a monthly payment of $2,000. Accelerated biweekly sets the payment at exactly half the monthly amount — $1,000 — and collects it every two weeks. Since there are 52 weeks in a year, that's 26 payments annually, at $1,000 each, for a total of $26,000 paid per year. Compare that to the plain monthly schedule: $2,000 × 12 = $24,000 per year. The accelerated biweekly schedule pays an extra $2,000 a year — the equivalent of one additional full monthly payment — and that entire extra amount goes straight to reducing principal, which is exactly what shortens the overall amortization.
Shortening amortization normally means using prepayment privilege room, which is capped annually, or increasing the regular payment through the payment-increase option, which is also limited. Choosing accelerated biweekly instead requires no privilege room, no lender approval beyond electing the frequency, and no penalty exposure of any kind — it's simply a different way of splitting the same annual obligation into smaller, more frequent pieces, with one of those pieces genuinely extra. It is worth mentioning to every client at every renewal or switch conversation, regardless of anything else changing on the file.
“Biweekly” and “accelerated biweekly” are not the same thing, and conflating them is a common, avoidable error. Regular (non-accelerated) biweekly simply takes the same annual total as monthly payments — $24,000 in the example above — and divides it evenly across 26 payments of about $923 each. No extra money is paid over the course of the year; the total is identical to monthly, just sliced differently. Only the accelerated version adds the extra payment, by basing the biweekly amount on half the monthly figure rather than on a twenty-sixth of the annual total. Advising a client that “biweekly” alone will shorten their amortization, without confirming it's the accelerated version, is a genuine and common mistake.
Because there's no cost or approval barrier to changing payment frequency, it belongs in every renewal and switch conversation as a standing offer, independent of whatever else is being negotiated on rate or lender. A client who's otherwise doing a straightforward straight renewal with no other changes can still meaningfully shorten their amortization simply by switching from monthly, or from regular biweekly, to accelerated biweekly — a genuinely free improvement worth raising every time.
A client switches from monthly payments to regular (non-accelerated) biweekly payments. Does this shorten their amortization the same way accelerated biweekly would?
This is the exact confusion the module is built to prevent: regular biweekly reslices the identical annual total into smaller, more frequent pieces without adding anything extra, so it does not shorten amortization on its own. Accelerated biweekly is calculated differently — as half the monthly payment, paid 26 times — which genuinely adds a 13th monthly-equivalent payment each year. The effect isn't limited to a first-year novelty, and it isn't true that only lump-sum prepayments matter; frequency alone, chosen correctly, is a real and ongoing lever.
The intro and first module are free to read. Add your name and email once and the rest of this course opens — along with every other course on the site. No card, no trial.
Already unlocked on another device?
