New brokers sometimes write a submission note the way they'd write a cover letter — building a case for the client, leading with strengths, framed persuasively. Underwriters aren't moved by that framing, because their job isn't to be convinced the borrower is a good person; it's to verify that the numbers support the request. A submission note works better as a structured answer key: the specific facts an underwriter needs, presented in the order they need them, so nothing requires a follow-up question to locate.
A consistent structure, used on every file, does for the submission note what the sequencing in Module 01 does for the document set itself. A reliable version: a borrower snapshot (who, employment type, credit tier), the ask (loan amount, purpose, product and term requested), the ratios as calculated by the broker, a property snapshot, down payment or source of funds in a single clear line, and a short notes section addressing anything unusual — which Module 03 covers in depth.
“The client has strong affordability” tells an underwriter nothing they can act on. “GDS 32%, TDS 38%” tells them exactly what they need to know, in the vocabulary they already think in. The underwriter is going to recalculate the ratios independently regardless of what the note says — stating your own numbers plainly, rather than describing them in adjectives, does two things: it saves the underwriter the step of deriving what you already know, and it builds trust the moment their own number matches yours. A note full of confident adjectives and no numbers reads as either inexperienced or evasive, neither of which speeds up a file.
A submission note that fits on one screen, without scrolling, tends to get read in full. A longer one tends to get skimmed — and a skimmed note is exactly where the mitigating detail that would have prevented a follow-up question gets missed, not because the underwriter is careless, but because length invites skimming the way brevity invites a full read. If a note is running long, the fix usually isn't cutting content arbitrarily; it's moving detail that belongs in the documentation itself (income calculations, credit history) out of the note and leaving only what the note is actually for: a fast, structured orientation to the file.
A self-employed borrower with two years of averaged income might read: “Borrower: self-employed, sole proprietor, 4 years in business, 720 credit score. Ask: $420,000 purchase, 5-year fixed, insured. Ratios: GDS 29%, TDS 33%, based on 2-year average line 150 income of $95,000 and $110,000. Property: single-family, owner-occupied, purchase price $525,000. Down payment: 20% from savings, 3 months' statements attached. Notes: income shows a genuine increase year-over-year tied to a documented new commercial contract — see attached letter from accountant.” Every sentence answers a specific question an underwriter would otherwise have to ask, and the whole note reads in under thirty seconds.
Which of these submission-note openings is most useful to an underwriter on a first read?
The second option is the only one that gives the underwriter usable, specific facts — employment tenure, credit tier, the ask, and the actual calculated ratios — in the order they'd need them, exactly the structure this module teaches. The others are variations on persuasive or vague language that require the underwriter to go digging for the numbers a good note would have simply stated, which is precisely the extra round trip this course is built to eliminate.
The intro and first module are free to read. Add your name and email once and the rest of this course opens — along with every other course on the site. No card, no trial.
Already unlocked on another device?
