Callbacks don't arrive in the order they matter. Triaging them by whoever called loudest ignores the thing that actually decides urgency: which clock the item landed on, and which coverage tier it falls under.
Key takeaways
Tarion's current form structure runs on fixed days from possession, not open-ended windows: the Initial Form lets a homeowner begin adding items the day after possession and auto-submits on day 41; the Mid-Year Form opens on day 42 and auto-submits on day 183; the Year-End Form opens on day 183 and auto-submits on day 365. A Second-Year Form can be submitted any time during the second year, and a Major Structural Defect Form any time after the second year but no later than seven years from possession.
Note the current terminology carefully: Tarion no longer calls the first-year form a “30-Day Form.” It's the Initial Form, and it runs to day 41, not day 30. A builder still triaging by the old name is working from an out-of-date map of the actual deadlines.
Once a form is submitted, the builder enters a 120-day initial repair period to resolve warranted items. That standard period doesn't apply evenly, though: exterior work and emergency situations demand different timeframes, and — critically for triage — the 120-day period does not apply to Major Structural Defect claims at all, which run on a separate track.
This is where triage order actually gets decided: an item on a 120-day clock competes for priority differently than one that's outside that clock altogether. Treating every callback as equally urgent, or triaging purely by how upset the homeowner sounds, misses the structure the warranty itself imposes.
Tarion's conciliation process changed for newer warranties: for homes with a warranty starting on or after May 1, 2024, a homeowner may request a conciliation inspection any time after a form is submitted, up to the next form's submission date — a materially different window than the older 30-day-plus-10-day grace period that still applies to earlier warranties. Once a Conciliation Assessment Report finds an item warranted, the builder gets a final 30 days to resolve it, and Tarion follows up 30 days after the report to confirm it's actually done.
Which conciliation rule applies to a given callback depends on when that specific home's warranty started — not on when the callback happened to come in. Triaging without checking that date risks either rushing an item that has more runway than it looks like it does, or badly under-prioritizing one that's about to age past its window.
Tarion's warranty runs in tiers, not a flat seven-year blanket: Year 1 is the broadest, covering defects in work and materials generally; Year 2 narrows to specific systems and categories set out in Tarion's own construction performance standards; Year 7 covers only major structural defects — not every defect that happens to surface late. A drywall crack reported in month 14 and a foundation-heave report in month 30 are not remotely the same triage problem, even though both are technically still “under warranty.”
A workable triage system checks three things for every incoming callback before deciding priority: which form clock it falls under (and how much runway is left before the next auto-submission date), whether it's inside the standard 120-day repair period or on a separate track like a Major Structural Defect claim, and which coverage tier applies to the specific item. Only once those three are known does severity — life-safety issue, functional failure, or cosmetic item — sensibly determine the order within that structure.
Skipping straight to severity without checking the clock first is the mistake that costs the most: an item that's genuinely urgent but has months of runway left on its clock can reasonably wait a few days behind one that's about to age out of a submission window, even if the second item sounds less dramatic on the phone.
The same underlying discipline that makes a site diary useful in a lien dispute makes a callback log useful here too: a dated record of when each item was reported, which clock it was assigned to, and when it was actually resolved is what lets a builder demonstrate the 120-day period was met, item by item, rather than asserting it after the fact.
A worked example
Three callbacks land the same week: a drywall crack (a Year 1 finishing item), a furnace fault reported at month 14 (a Year 2 systems item), and a report of foundation heave at month 30 (a possible Major Structural Defect).
Triaged by volume of complaint alone, the loudest call wins. Triaged by clock and tier instead: the drywall crack sits inside the broadest coverage year and the standard 120-day repair period applies cleanly. The furnace fault has to be checked against Tarion's own performance standards for what Year 2 actually covers before assuming it's warranted at all. The foundation report is the one that changes the whole picture — if it's genuinely a Major Structural Defect, it runs on its own track outside the 120-day period, potentially all the way out to year seven, and needs a different process from the other two entirely.
The correct triage order isn't obvious from how each callback sounds on the phone — it's only visible once each one is checked against its own clock and its own coverage tier. In this example, the foundation report gets escalated first regardless of how calmly it was reported, precisely because getting the Major Structural Defect determination started early protects the homeowner's own runway under that separate, much longer clock.
A 120-day initial repair period generally applies once a form is submitted, though exterior work and emergencies can shift that timeframe, and Major Structural Defect claims are excluded from the 120-day period entirely.
It's now the Initial Form, and it auto-submits on day 41 rather than day 30 — a real change from the older naming and window some builders and buyers still assume applies.
Yes. For warranties starting on or after May 1, 2024, a homeowner can request conciliation any time after a form is submitted up to the next form's submission date. Earlier warranties run on the older window — generally 30 days after the builder repair period ends, plus a 10-day grace period.
No. Coverage narrows by year: Year 1 is broadest, Year 2 is limited to specific systems and categories, and Year 7 covers only major structural defects — defects serious enough to affect the structural integrity of load-bearing elements, not every issue that happens to surface late.
For genuine life-safety issues, yes — those get addressed immediately regardless of which form or tier they technically fall under. For everything short of that, checking the clock and tier first, then triaging by severity within that structure, produces a far more defensible and consistent order than severity alone.
Then it's worth checking before it's logged as a warranty item at all. See weather days and the record you need for how to establish what a specific day's conditions actually were, which can settle whether an issue is a covered defect or an unrelated environmental event.
A 30-minute call is enough to tell you whether AI pays for itself here.
