Treadstone Associates
Case File · Licensing & Unregistered Practice

An assistant who crossed into registrable work

Anonymised, illustrative composite. A Toronto broker's full-time personal assistant went from managing a calendar to hosting open houses solo and pre-negotiating terms with buyers — a drift that took months, and that crossed a real registration line long before anyone at the brokerage noticed.

Treadstone Associates · Updated 2026

At a glance

  • • Ontario, an unregistered personal assistant is hired for scheduling and paperwork, then gradually takes on open-house hosting and buyer negotiation on their own.
  • • RECO's own registration-verification guidance frames trading in real estate as work only a registered salesperson, broker, or brokerage may perform.
  • • The operative statutory definition of “trading in real estate” — disposition, acquisition, listing, and any act or negotiation in furtherance of one — is described in secondary commentary rather than confirmed on a currently-live RECO bulletin page.
  • • A separate, independent problem sat underneath the registration question: the assistant had been paid a flat contractor rate for full-time, exclusive hours with no other clients.

The situation

A busy broker hired a personal assistant to handle scheduling, paperwork, and CRM data entry — explicitly non-trading work, and a legitimate role for someone without a real estate registration. Over about eight months, the role quietly expanded: the assistant began hosting open houses alone when the broker was double-booked, driving buyer clients to showings and walking them through homes unaccompanied, and once drafted preliminary terms for an offer that the broker only reviewed after the fact.

None of this was formally assigned. Each individual step looked, in the moment, like a reasonable extension of an already-trusted role — covering an open house nobody else could attend, being helpful to a client who asked a direct question during a showing. The cumulative drift was only visible in hindsight, once a fellow agent at the brokerage raised a concern after seeing the assistant alone at a listing appointment.

The problem

Ontario draws a real line between administrative support and registrable work, even though RECO's own currently-live bulletin pages did not, on the fetches checked for this file, spell out the statutory test in one place. A secondary source — a named Ontario real estate lawyer and broker's practice commentary, dated 2022, describes the operative definition of “trading in real estate” under the governing legislation as including “a disposition or acquisition of or transaction in real estate… any offer or attempt to list real estate for the purpose of such a disposition, acquisition or transaction… any act, advertisement, conduct or negotiation, directly or indirectly, in furtherance of any disposition, acquisition, transaction, offer or attempt.” This is cited here as secondary commentary, not as a RECO source — the bulletin page a RECO search once indexed under this heading no longer resolves.

Under that description, hosting an open house solo, walking a buyer through a home, and drafting preliminary offer terms each read as an act or negotiation in furtherance of a transaction — exactly the category reserved to a registered person. Data entry, scheduling, and paperwork preparation do not, on the same description, cross that line on their own. RECO's own consumer-facing guidance reinforces the underlying principle from a different angle: it directs buyers and sellers to verify registration before relying on someone conducting real estate business, which only makes sense if trading is, in fact, reserved to registered people.

A second, independent problem sat underneath the registration question. The assistant worked full-time, exclusively for this broker, on a flat rate with no other clients and no ability to send a substitute — the classic markers Canadian courts and the CRA weigh in an employee-versus-contractor analysis, where the test is “whether the person is performing the services as a person in business on their own account,” assessed holistically and never decided by the contract's label alone.

The numbers

The assistant hosted an estimated six open houses solo over the eight-month drift and was present unaccompanied at roughly a dozen buyer showings. The one instance of drafted preliminary offer terms was caught and corrected by the broker before anything was presented to a seller, so no transaction actually closed on terms the assistant had negotiated unsupervised.

The assistant had been paid a flat monthly contractor rate for what had become, in practice, full-time and exclusive hours — a fact separate from, but discovered alongside, the registration question once the brokerage's compliance review began.

The rule that decided it

The registration question turned on the nature of the acts themselves, not on the assistant's job title or how the role had been described when hired. “Personal assistant” was never the problem; solo open houses, unaccompanied buyer walkthroughs, and negotiating preliminary terms were, because each falls inside the acts-in-furtherance-of-a-transaction description that only a registered person may perform.

The employment question turned on the same holistic test used across Ontario generally, not a real-estate-specific rule: full-time, exclusive hours, a flat rate, and no ability to substitute all point toward employee or dependent-contractor status regardless of the word used in the assistant's own paperwork. Misclassification exposure here runs through the ordinary ESA and CRA channels — unpaid overtime and vacation pay exposure on one side, unremitted CPP/EI contributions with penalties and interest reaching back multiple years on the other — independent of whatever the registration review found.

The outcome

The broker immediately stopped assigning any client-facing task to the assistant and restricted the role back to its original scope: scheduling, data entry, and paperwork preparation with no unaccompanied client contact. The brokerage's broker of record reviewed the file and treated it as a coaching matter rather than escalating to RECO, given that no transaction had actually closed on terms the assistant had negotiated.

Separately, the broker moved the assistant onto a proper T4 payroll arrangement rather than continuing a flat contractor rate for what had become full-time, exclusive work — addressing the employment-classification exposure directly rather than leaving it to be discovered later in a CRA or ESA review.

On the employment-classification question underneath this file, see the independent-contractor-status glossary entry, and for a licensing gap that opened a different way, a lapsed registration caught mid-deal.

The tell

The tell was the word “just this once” repeated six times. Each individual open house covered, each single showing driven, felt like an isolated accommodation rather than a pattern — and no one was tracking the accumulation until a colleague's outside observation forced the question. An unregistered assistant's role needs a standing, written boundary — no unaccompanied client contact, ever, regardless of how busy the broker is — because the drift from administrative help to registrable work rarely arrives as one obvious decision.

Takeaways

  • • Trading in real estate is described, in the sourced commentary on the governing definition, as covering any act, advertisement, or negotiation in furtherance of a disposition, acquisition, or listing — not just signing documents.
  • • Solo open houses, unaccompanied buyer walkthroughs, and negotiating even preliminary terms fall on the registrable side of that line; scheduling, data entry, and paperwork prep do not.
  • • A job title of “assistant” does not define the boundary — the specific acts performed do, regardless of how the role was originally scoped.
  • • Full-time, exclusive hours at a flat rate with no ability to substitute point toward employee or dependent-contractor status under the ordinary CRA/ESA test, a separate exposure from the registration question entirely.

Keep an assistant's role on the right side of the line.

A short call is enough to see how AI-assisted workflow tools handle scheduling and paperwork without ever needing a registration.